Conspiracy

 

Conspiracy seen by French ambassador

Immediately after his arrest, the French ambassador was asked by Ghosn to rush to Nissan headquarters and conveyed his request to appoint a lawyer. The sight of the ambassador there was the rest of the directors who rejected the request calmly.In all, the arrest was a planned action. These facts were first revealed when Ghosn escaped abroad and became free to speak. The Japanese media show no interest in this surprising press. This is a problem before sensory paralysis. No, since the prosecution leak information has been reported guilty, if the truth that shows innocence comes out, it is the fact that there is no other way but to ignore and silence.

In Kerry's case, the plot was more naked. He had no plans to come to Japan, and was initially reported to have been apprehended by conspiracy and immediately arrested. This is unmistakably presumed guilty coverage.

Conspiracy seen from arrest warrant issuance procedure

The arrest warrant is issued by showing the warrant judge a charge of the crime and showing proof of the crime. Ghosn's suspicion was allegedly a false statement in a security report. In other words, the evidence mainly includes accounting materials owned by the company.Company-owned accounting data is voluntarily provided to third parties and prosecutors only with the consent of the Board of Directors or the representative. This is clearly a theft and a conspiracy, since Nissan's representatives, Ghosn and Kelly, voluntarily provided evidence without their knowledge. Who voluntarily submitted to the prosecution.

If you think about it and hit it, it is a prosecutor's investigation that dusts out. It seems impossible work for Japanese media who rely on leak information. Foreign reporters must be oblivious to the outline of false charges.

Conspiracy visible from additional prosecution of Nissan Corporation

Nissan is the main culprit for the misrepresentation of securities. First, a corporation is subject to administrative sanctions, and then humans are fined for criminal penalties if the case is serious and severely damaged. Any criminal offense to a director must be all officers who have approved the securities report. Of course, it also includes internal auditors.There is no rational legal basis limited to Ghosn and Kelly in any way.The order of punishment is completely reversed, arbitrary and prejudiced. In particular, it clearly shows that the fact that the later prosecuted Nissan Corporation admitted the charges earlier was more conspiracy than anything else.Usually, Ghosn and Kelly are fighting, so it is reasonable that the remaining directors and officers of the same crime also fight.

The conspiracy was elaborated over a long period

It is obviously impossible to expulse Ghosn and Kelly from Nissan for false statements in the securities report. Because it is a formal offender. So the conspirators sought to blame for a more felony extrajudicial offense. Major crime Renault cannot defend Ghosn in this crime. Therefore The only way to gather evidence of special breach of crime is to arrest and prosecute Nissan headquarters or a foreign branch for any crime that could lead to a forced investigation.The excuse for this raid was the misrepresentation of a formal offender in falsely stating important matters in a securities report. However, he was arrested a crime that was not originally a crime and broke down before obtaining strong conclusive evidence of his special abuse. This case is a major case that remains in history as a false charge case in which prosecutors also influenced the fate of global companies.

Regulatory authorities to keep silence -The remaining questions-

The actions taken by the regulatory authorities are completely different between the crime of misrepresentation of important matters in securities and the crime of special breach. In fact, Gone's personal transaction, the transfer of financial derivatives, has been rectified by the SEC and has been corrected. The prosecutor nevertheless indicted. The first special allegation. The problem is the second alleged extradition.Due to the perfectly normal nature of the transaction, the existence of a pre-share agreement between Ghosn and the owner of the sales incentive distributor in order to be a criminal offender is in respect of the sales incentive paid ｒequired.This is, by nature, only complete confession evidence. Ghosn consistently argued that there was no such secret sharing agreement, but prosecutors forced a confession even after long-term detention. If the confession of the distributor owner does not exist, it is a complete false accusation.Ghosn's residence was restricted and no free behavior was allowed to prohibit contact with the owner.Over time, the truth will become clear, including the presence or absence of this owner's confession.